ShareThis Page

Torture killer Smyrnes requests retrial in letter to Westmoreland judge

Rich Cholodofsky
| Thursday, March 21, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Ricky Smyrnes sat in the back of a sheriff's car after being sentenced to death by a Westmoreland County jury on Thursday, February 28, 2013.
Ricky Smyrnes sat in the back of a sheriff's car after being sentenced to death by a Westmoreland County jury on Thursday, February 28, 2013.

Convicted killer Ricky Smyrnes wants a new trial, and he wrote a letter to a Westmoreland County judge from his prison cell to ask for one.

After a six-week trial, Smyrnes, 27, was sentenced to death last month for the February 2010 torture slaying of a mentally challenged Mt. Pleasant woman.

Smyrnes, a former resident of North Huntingdon and McKeesport, was the mastermind who manipulated his five Greensburg roommates as the group held 30-year-old Jennifer Daugherty captive for more than two days, tortured her and then killed her, prosecutors said.

During his trial, defense attorneys Mike DeRiso and Terrance Faye argued Smyrnes' life should be spared because of his low IQ.

District Attorney John Peck said Smyrnes' letter to Judge Rita Hathaway disproves that contention.

“It's a coherent and thoughtful letter to the judge claiming he was improperly convicted. It undermines his claim of having an intellectual disability,” Peck said.

Smyrnes printed his one-page letter, which included minor spelling and grammatical errors.

Smyrnes asked Hathaway or the U.S. Supreme Court to give him a new trial.

“I didn't stand a chance against my past mental health and criminal record,” Smyrnes wrote.

“My retardation was also used badly on me. John Peck has went out of control on using my abuse against me. It was a (sic) unfair jury trial. Please give me another chance?”

Defense attorneys presented testimony indicating that Smyrnes had such low intelligence that he could not function normally in society. They contended Smyrnes was physically, mentally and emotionally abused by his birth parents before he was adopted.

Peck said Smyrnes' letter, mailed this week from the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, was stylistically similar to other letters he sent to the District Attorney's Office before the trial.

“The handwriting is consistent,” Peck said.

Hathaway did not respond directly to Smyrnes but sent a letter to his lawyers, asking that they address his concerns.

DeRiso and Faye have said they would appeal Smyrnes' conviction and death sentence.

Smyrnes turned on Daugherty because he was involved romantically with another roommate, Amber Meidinger, 20, who is now imprisoned for life, and she was jealous of Daugherty, according to trial testimony.

The group tied up the victim, beat her with a broken towel rack and a vacuum hose and forced her to drink foul concoctions of bodily fluids and household cleaners, according to trial testimony. They cut Daugherty's hair, poured nail polish on her and taunted her, Meidinger told the jury.

Daugherty's body was found Feb. 11, 2010, in a garbage can dumped in the parking lot of Greensburg Salem Middle School.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. He canbe reached at 724-830-6293or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.