North Huntingdon contractor charged with fraud
A North Huntingdon contractor was arraigned on Thursday on allegations he stole more than $36,000 from an elderly Greensburg man for home improvements never finished.
Raymond Kollar, 56, was arraigned before Greensburg District Judge James Albert on charges of home improvement fraud, theft and receiving stolen property.
Kollar received advance payments from an 82-year-old man between August and this month and never finished the work, Greensburg police Detective Sgt. Henry Fontana said.
A person who helps the alleged victim with his finances noticed “Mr. Kollar was hired to do several projects but nothing appears to be finished and the price he charged for some of the jobs appears to be overpriced,” according to court records.
Kollar started roof and porch work several weeks ago and didn't finish it, police said. Ladders remain in place against the elderly man's home, investigators said.
Authorities estimated the victim paid Kollar at least $36,400.
Kollar is not registered under the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, police said, and his registration with the state Attorney General's office expired on July 22, 2011.
Westmoreland County detectives charged Kollar with similar crimes stemming from a 2012 incident in Jeannette, according to county court records. That case has not been resolved.
Kollar, who was jailed in lieu of posting $10,000 straight bond on the latest charges, faces a preliminary hearing before Albert on Thursday.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.