Ligonier Valley budget keeps taxes in check
Ligonier Valley residents should see no increase in school district real estate taxes for 2013-14.
The preliminary budget approved by school directors on Monday holds taxes at 75 mills.
That means the average district taxpayer — those with properties with an assessed value of about $16,700 — will owe about $1,250 annually in school taxes.
One mill brings in about $166,000 to the district.
The budget totals $26.5 million and includes a $484,000 increase in expenses from the 2012-13 budget, according to business manager Don Irwin.
No furloughs are planned, but the district will not replace two positions resulting from resignations.
Although the budget doesn't dip in to the district's $2.5 million in savings, nothing will be added to that reserve account, Irwin said.
“There's no planned savings, no. But this budget includes substantial investments into the district's infrastructure — with the down payment on the new roof at Laurel Valley Elementary School — and substantial investments into the education programs — such as the $150,000 allocated into the high school's new iPad initiative,” Irwin said.
The tentative budget — approved by school directors unanimously — will be available for public inspection at the district's administration building for 30 days. The school board will likely pass the final budget at its May 13 meeting.
Irwin said some numbers in the budget could change in the next 30 days, as the state budget continues to adapt.
Jewels Phraner is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.