Political parties to select next Westmoreland jury commissioners
Westmoreland County's next jury commissioners will be selected by the local political parties.
Commonwealth Court Judge James Gardner Collins ruled last week there was not enough time to place the jury commissioner race on the May 21 primary ballot.
Last month, the state Supreme Court overturned a law that gave county commissioners authority to abolish jury commissioner posts. They oversee the selection of potential jurors for criminal and civil trials.
Westmoreland County commissioners last year eliminated two jury commissioner positions, effective at the end of the present terms for incumbents Dan Blissman, a Democrat, and Debbie Irwin, a Republican. Their duties were to be taken over next year by the court administrator's office.
Under Collins' order, the local Democratic and Republican committees will nominate one candidate to appear on the November ballot. Those candidates, barring an unexpected victory by a write-in candidate, would serve a four-year term.
Westmoreland Democratic Committee Chairman Dante Bertani and Republican Committee leader Jill Cooper could not be reached on Tuesday.
Larry Thompson, president of the Pennsylvania State Association of Jury Commissioners, said the association will consider an appeal to Collins' order because it denies voters the right to choose candidates.
“We defeated Goliath in the Supreme Court, and the battle is not over,” Thompson said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com. Staff writer Adam Brandolph contributed.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.