Share This Page

Public invited to meet Southmoreland School Board candidates

| Monday, April 29, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

The Friends of Education from Scottdale have organized a forum, inviting the public to meet and hear comments from the candidates seeking the four open seats on the Southmoreland School Board.

“Your vote for school board candidates is very important. They determine your tax rate and education outcomes,” Friends of Education member Karen Kiefer said. “The forum is open to everyone and all of the candidates have been invited to participate.”

There are seven candidates seeking nominations for the four open positions. They are Robert Callaro, Lois A. Eberly, Heather Wise-Yanko, and incumbents Catherine F. Fike, Levi Miller, Gail Rhodes, and Cheryl Bailey Shipley.

All candidates have cross-filed.

“All the candidates will have the opportunity to introduce themselves and explain what there platforms are,” Kiefer said. “There will also be time for a question and answer period.”

Kiefer said that the candidates have been contacted and she hopes that all will be present at the event.

She said the event will enable the voters and district residents to meet with and talk to the candidates, getting a better idea of what each and every candidate plans to bring to the office if elected.

“Meet the candidates, ask questions, ask how they will vote on taxes, hear their educational philosophy and learn more about the school district, then decide for whom to vote on May 21,” Kiefer said.

An informal gathering will follow the forum.

“We hope that people, both young and old, will come to what we feel will be an interesting and educational evening,” Kiefer said

The forum will take place starting at 7 p.m. Wednesday at the Scottdale Public Library.

Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.