Trooper threats land Derry Twp. man in jail
A Derry Township man was jailed for allegedly threatening two troopers with a 10-gauge shotgun last week when they went to his home to serve him a warrant for an involuntary commitment for mental health treatment, state police at Greensburg said.
Ronald J. Geary, 54, of Bradenville told troopers John Isoldi and Michael Dzvonik, “How about I come out and shoot you” and “I'm gonna shoot you, trooper” when the officers went to his front door at 5:40 p.m. on April 25,
Geary walked out of his house holding the shotgun and told the troopers to leave. Both officers took cover and drew their weapons, according to the affidavit. After a few seconds, Geary went back inside, then emerged with his hands raised and without the shotgun, police said.
As Geary was being taken to Excela Westmoreland Behavioral Health Adult Inpatient unit in Greensburg, he told troopers, “You guys are so lucky I didn't kill you. I could have shot you,” and “You guys are lucky I didn't bring my semi-auto gun,” according to the affadavit.
Geary was charged with two counts each of aggravated assault, simple assault, terroristic threats and recklessly endangering another person.
He was arraigned Tuesday before Derry Township District Judge Mark Bilik and placed in the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $20,000 bond, pending a preliminary hearing scheduled for May 8.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.