Ligonier supervisor quits in middle of campaign
Ligonier Township Supervisor Keith Whipkey resigned Wednesday morning in the midst of his re-election campaign, citing personal reasons, according to a township official.
Supervisor Tim Komar said supervisors will hold a special meeting at 8 a.m. Thursday to accept the resignation. Komar declined to release Whipkey's letter of resignation until it has been formally accepted by the board.
Whipkey, 57, did not respond to multiple attempts to reach him for comment.
By Wednesday afternoon an “Elect Keith Whipkey” sign had been removed from his front yard.
His name will still appear on the primary election ballot for the Republican nomination for a six-year term, along with challenger Scott Matson's, said Jim Montini, director of the Westmoreland County Election Bureau.
“The ballots have already been printed; it's too late to withdraw,” Montini said Wednesday.
If Whipkey wins the nomination, he will have until Aug. 12 to withdraw from the general election. Montini said the seat then would be declared vacant, and the election bureau would accept substitute nominations from the county Republican Committee.
Montini said he had not heard from Whipkey as of Wednesday afternoon.
Whipkey served as a supervisor for 16 years and prior to that worked in the paid, non-elected position as secretary-treasurer to the board.
“He's personally going through a lot right now. This is what's best for him, personally,” Komar said.
Personnel issues fall under the state's list of Sunshine Law exemptions, which means they can be discussed in a private executive session. Any votes, however, must be taken in a public meeting.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.