ShareThis Page

4 candidates seeking nod for Mt. Pleasant Township supervisor seat

| Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Four candidates are seeking their party's nomination in the May 21 primary for the one open six-year term of Mt. Pleasant Township supervisor.

On the Democratic ticket are incumbent Frank Puskar and Robert Hudec. On the Republican ticket are Aaron Howard and Robert Whalen.

Puskar, 44, is in his first full six-year term. Before that, he had been appointed to the seat which had been vacated.

“I am very proud to be a part of what has been accomplished in our township over the past few years,” Puskar said. “We have worked hard to keep the roads up and with grants, completed projects, and doing a lot of work inhouse, we have been able to save the taxpayers of the township a lot of money over the years. I am also very proud to say that there has not been a increase in the taxes in the township for 74 years and I personally would like to see that continue.”

Hudec, 52, says he wants to seek more grant money and see the township go in a better direction.

“First off, I definitely want to help the fire departments and the EMS in our township,” Hudec said. “I want our township to have a different look and we need to go in a different direction because we have been spinning our wheels in a hole. I'd like to seek more grant money for the roads, parks and recreation and other programs and I just feel that there is a lot in the township that needs addressing. It's time for new leadership.”

Howard, 35, said he could be a big asset to the township.

“One of the first things that I would like to see is a pay freeze for all the supervisors. I personally do not feel that any elected official should receive a raise while the economy is bad. I would also like to try to cooperate with the borough to arrange for their police to also cover the township, with us possibly splitting the cost. We need more of a police presence in the township. I also think that we should work on making the township more attractive to try and draw more families to the township. I have a lot of ideas that I feel would be good for the township,” said Howard.

Whalen, 54, would like to address some citizens who have voiced disapproval of the present supervisors.

“I am disappointed with the incumbents' lack of service as they are not responsive to issues and concerns of the citizens of the township,” Whalen said. “I would work to actively seek the tearing down of the old Hecla school building which is a huge safety concern and I also feel that all of the township business has to be completely transparent. Everyone in the township has a right to know what is and what isn't being done and if you would come to me with an issue or concern, no matter how big or small, they would all be equally important to me.”

East Huntingdon

Although East Huntingdon supervisor Democrat Howard Keefer's name appears in the official listing for the upcoming election, he has decided to withdraw after 29 years.

“I sat down with my wife and we talked and we decided that it would be best if I not run for another term,” Keefer said. “I thought about it a long time and I will not be running again.”

Challenger Justin Morrow, Democrat, will now be running unopposed.

Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.