N. Huntingdon man to serve time for assault, robbery
A North Huntingdon man was sentenced Tuesday to 11 1⁄2 to 23 months in prison for assaulting and robbing a man behind a Hempfield shopping center last year.
Andrew Jeremy Magill, 22, pleaded guilty before Judge Debra Pezze to a robbery charge.
The victim was present in court and Assistant District Attorney Karen Patterson said the man and his family would like to “put this behind them.”
They declined to address the court.
Last June 7, the victim, who was 29, had approached Magill's wife, who was 17, at the Longbada Lounge on West Pittsburgh Street in Greensburg and allegedly offered to pay the teen for sexual favors, according to police.
Before the bar closed, Magill and his wife invited the victim to drink with them. They drove the man behind the Shop ‘n Save off Route 136, where Magill assaulted him around 3 a.m. and robbed him of $569, police said.
Police said the victim suffered forehead lacerations that required stitches and the assault loosened metal pins that had been recently placed in the man's back.
Magill entered pleas in four other unrelated cases Tuesday in what Pezze called a “one-year crime spree.”
The other charges included driving under the influence, defiant trespass, fleeing or attempting to elude police and corruption of minors for providing alcohol to minors.
A five-year probation term will follow Magill's incarceration. He was ordered to report to the Westmoreland County Prison in Hempfield on June 21.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.