Charges dropped in police stand-off in Jeannette
Charges have been dismissed against a Jeannette man accused in a nearly five-hour standoff with police in August.
Witnesses failed to show up at a nonjury trial for Joseph D. Caltagirone III, 36, who has been in jail since his arrest.
Assistant District Attorney Wayne Gongaware said victims in the case were subpoenaed to testify, but prosecutors were unable to locate them.
“We expected that and that's why we scheduled it for a nonjury trial,” Judge Debra Pezze said.
She dismissed three counts of aggravated assault and single charges of simple assault, terroristic threats and reckless endangerment.
Caltagirone was accused of threatening a neighbor with a rifle on Aug. 8. Police said they asked Caltagirone to come out, and when he didn't respond they evacuated nearby homes.
The incident began in the 100 block of North Third Street around 9 p.m. on Aug. 8 and Caltagirone peacefully surrendered at 1:40 a.m. Aug. 9, according to police
After Pezze dismissed the charges, Caltagirone asked if he could hug his wife.
“I haven't seen her in months,” he said.
Pezze denied the request, adding that Caltagirone would see his wife Thursday evening after his release from the Westmoreland County Prison.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.