ShareThis Page

Revised incubation allows Norwin students to attend prom

| Saturday, May 11, 2013, 1:11 a.m.

In addition to the regular prom preparation to-do list of renting and buying black-tie attire, picking up a corsage or boutonniere and posing with friends for photos, several Norwin High School students had to add another item: Getting a chickenpox vaccine.

The Westmoreland County school district announced Thursday that a high school student had contracted chickenpox, an airborne, contagious virus.

Because of that, 33 students without immunization records will be excluded from school activities for the virus' incubation period — and that included nine students planning to attend Friday's prom, the district said Thursday.

But on Friday, the district released updated information listing the incubation period as between May 12 and May 25, allowing students to attend prom.

“That is the period when people who are not immunized are at the most risk to spread the virus,” said Tracy McNelly, assistant superintendent of secondary education.

In a statement, Norwin said it “was provided with a revised incubation period for the chickenpox virus by the Pennsylvania Department of Health.”

Kait Gillis, deputy press secretary at the state Department of Health, on Friday listed May 13 as the start of the incubation period.

The health department recommends students be excluded from school and extracurricular activities during the incubation period, Gillis said, but it's not a mandate.

Parents may opt out of vaccinations for religious or medical reasons, but those students may be barred if there's an outbreak, according to the state Department of Health's website.

As of Friday afternoon, 14 of the original 33 students had not been immunized, McNelly said. Those students will be excluded from school beginning Monday, she said.

Of the nine impacted students attending prom, seven ended up getting vaccinated, McNelly said.

Among them was Nicky Neveu, a junior who said she was called into a meeting Thursday and told about the situation that would have barred her from prom.

“I got my vaccine that day. We rushed to Walgreens,” she said. “I got the very last dose. ... Thank goodness.”

Neveu, 17, said she's been planning to attend prom for a while, she has SAT tests soon, and she didn't want to miss the seniors' last day.

Nicky's mother, Sharon Neveu, said she and her husband chose to opt out of the immunization. Because parents are given the option, she said, telling students they couldn't attend prom sent “a double message.”

“I just feel like things were blown out of proportion a little bit,” she said. “It's chickenpox for Pete's sake.”

Sharon Neveu said she'll continue to discuss the situation with district decision-makers.

“To punish the students and the late notice and all of that was just frustrating for me,” she said. “I did whatever I felt I needed to do based on the time frame that we had. And that's when I chose to go ahead and get her the shot.”

To Marissa Huss, a Norwin senior, getting the vaccine does not mesh with her beliefs, but she got it anyway.

“I really didn't have a choice,” Huss, 18, said. “I'm a senior class officer, so I planned the entire prom. I planned graduation also, and I'm speaking at graduation. All of that would have been taken away from me if I didn't get that immunization.”

Nowhere in Westmoreland County were vaccines available, so Huss traveled to the Allegheny Department of Health for the $95 shot.

District administration is working on a plan to make sure that students will be able to complete their academic requirements.

Rossilynne Skena is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.