LV passes on high roof bids
Ligonier Valley school directors Monday night rejected bids for replacing the roof at Laurel Valley Elementary School.
Business manager Don Irwin reported all the bids came in at about $100,000 more than what he expected.
He said he anticipated the project to come in between $500,000 and $700,000, and the lowest bid the school district received totaled $786,000.
School directors followed his recommendation to reject the bids, sign a one-year agreement to address any emergency roof repairs, at a cost of $6,000, and reissue the request for bids in December.
“I don't know if we were too late in starting the bidding process, and these roofers already have enough work, so they are willing to do the work, but at their price,” he said. “I think we have a fiduciary responsibility to repair the roof, but I don't think we necessarily have to do it this summer, and there's no reason to overpay.”
School directors also approved a resolution that gives administrators power to reduce staff as needed.
This “standard resolution” appears on the agenda every year, as a precautionary measure, Irwin said.
Next year's budget, approved tentatively by directors last month, does not account for any reduction in staff, Irwin said.
In other news, directors approved the 2013 Homestead and Farmstead Exclusion Resolution, which gives the owners of such properties a discount of $66.60 on their real estate taxes, according to school director Irv Tantlinger.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.