Greensburg beer distributor will obey rules, take down signs
A Greensburg beer distributor said he will remove two portable advertising signs, after a city board on Wednesday upheld a zoning officer's decision that found the displays to be in violation of the city's zoning ordinance.
“I didn't go through the right process, obviously ... and I'll take them down tonight,” said Frank Mesich of Pittsburgh Street Beverage at 660 E. Pittsburgh St.
Mesich said he put up the two signs out of concern prospective customers might not see his business, which is in an alley and approximately 100 feet off East Pittsburgh Street.
Solicitor Lou DeRose told the zoning board portable signs aren't allowed in the involved area.
“I really must tell the board, you have no choice in the matter ... but to uphold the decision of the zoning officer (city planner Barbara Ciampini),” he added.
But before Mesich's comments and the board's decision, his attorney, John O'Connell, accused city planning officials of “selective enforcement” and being hostile to businesses.
“There are temporary signs all over the city of Greensburg ... that would be in violation of the ordinance,” he said.
“It's what you would call selective enforcement ... and it's (his client's signs) not doing harm to anyone,” he added.
He cited signs for the Greensburg Rotary on East Pittsburgh Street and Sandra Lynn's School of Dance on North Maple Avenue as two examples of violations because the displays flash.
“What's happening is some of the actions of city employees have discouraged people from doing business here,” O'Connell added.
He argued that because of the alleged selective enforcement, the zoning board could overrule Ciampini. DeRose maintained the board couldn't do that.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.