Murrysville council shoots down chicken-coop proposal
By Amanda Dolasinski
Published: Thursday, May 16, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
It turns out that far fewer people in Murrysville wanted chicken coops in their backyards after all.
With unanimous support, council decided to end discussion on a proposal allowing chicken coops on residential properties. Many agreed they received more pleas to keep chickens out of backyards than in support of chickens moving in.
“I haven't been approached with requests to have chickens,” Joan Kearns, council president, said. “I have been approached with requests not to reduce the acreage.”
Currently, only property owners with more than 10 acres can have chickens.
In February, council tasked the municipal planning commission to review zoning ordinance changes necessary for chickens. Part of the review included proposals for the acceptable number of chickens, size of property lots and types of chickens permitted.
Council occasionally receives requests for domestic chickens, but those amped up in light of neighboring North Huntingdon's domestic chicken proposal, said Jim Morrison, chief administrator.
Although its is closed for now, Morrison said he anticipates the proposal will likely come again in five years or so.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Time to renew Mt. Pleasant Glass Museum membership
- Police: Panhandler claimed to be trooper in Latrobe
- Driver just misses hitting Latrobe officer
- DA gets files in Ligonier Township case
- Greater Latrobe’s $9M athletic complex project in ‘home stretch’
- Jeannette officials back off plan to give administrators raises
- Hearts and Hands Quilt Guild to meet
- Mowry appeals sentence for manslaughter
- Export holds line on taxes
- For local schools, performance data gets mixed reviews
- Trafford police arrest woman selling drugs for `shopping money’