Hempfield Area OKs tentative plan for 2013-14 budget
Hempfield Area school directors are dipping into their cash reserves to balance the 2013-14 budget, but that infusion of cash is not enough to stave off a 1.5-mill tax increase.
The school board on Monday adopted a tentative budget that relies on $2.6 million from the surplus to balance the $84.2 million spending package. Revenue projections are $81.5 million.
A vote on the final budget will be conducted in June.
The millage rate would increase to 73.62 mills and generate more than $1 million in additional property taxes, according to Business Manager Jude Abraham. Each mill generates $596,000 in revenue.
“This is where we're at,” Abraham said.
Property taxes account for more than $43.3 million in revenue for the district, according to the budget.
Increases in health care for employees and pension contributions are putting a strain on the budget, he said. Abraham said it will cost taxpayers $800,000 more for health insurance and $972,000 in pension payments to the Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System.
Hempfield has cash reserves of $9.1 million that will shrink to $6.5 million by the end of the 2013-14 school year, Abraham said.
“We'll still have a very healthy fund balance.”
The district has been cutting expenses during the past several years. Earlier this year, the board voted to close the Bovard Elementary School and will shut down Crossroads, an alternative school for students who have trouble adapting to a normal classroom environment.
The closing will save the district $700,000.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.