Share This Page

Police: Man had drugs in backpack at Triangle Tech

| Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

An arrest warrant has been issued for a Triangle Tech student found with suspected heroin in his backpack while attending classes in the Greensburg technical school, according to police,

Alexander J. Primack, 21, of Greensburg is charged with two counts of possessing a controlled substance and one count of possessing drug paraphernalia, according to the warrant issued by Greensburg District Judge James Albert.

Police said officials at the East Pittsburgh Street school found the suspected drugs and drug paraphernalia last month when Primack fell asleep during class.

School officials believed he was under the influence of some type of substance at the time, police said.

Ten hypodermic needles — nine new and one used — a vial, plastic bags containing a white substance and several small, individual white papers wrapped in a rubber band were in the bag, police said.

At the station, police said they found 10 stamp bags of suspected heroin in the backpack. The bags were stamped “income tax,” police said. Authorities believe the white substance in the plastic bags was cocaine.

All of the items were sent to the state police crime lab for analysis.

Primack was dismissed from the school, authorities said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.