Woman charged with trying to tote gun into Westmoreland courthouse
An Allegheny County woman was charged this week with trying to bring a gun in to the Westmoreland County Courthouse.
The county's park police charged Kristen Ashley Owens, 23, of McKees Rocks with a misdemeanor count of possession of a firearm on county property.
According to the arrest report, Owens had a .38 caliber Smith & Wesson revolver loaded with five rounds in her purse when she entered the courthouse on June 11.
Owens told police she was accompanying a friend to a court hearing and forgot the weapon was in her purse. Officer Jason Monyok said he found the gun as Owens' purse went through the X-ray machine at the front door security station.
“She was licensed to carry the gun, but she just didn't tell us she had it,” Monyok said.
A county ordinance prohibits visitors and staff from bringing guns into the courthouse. Anyone with a gun is required to turn it over to the park police at the security station at the entrance. The gun is stored in a nearby locker and is retrieved when the owner leaves the courthouse, according to Park Police Lt. Kathy Logan.
Police officers are permitted to carry their sidearms in the courthouse, but they too must check their weapons with the park police before they enter a courtroom, Logan said.
The park police have filed charges in two cases this year against people who brought guns into the courthouse. No such charges were filed in 2012, Logan said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.