Yough board OKs 2 percent rise in taxes
Yough School Board members this week approved a proposed 2013-14 budget with a 2 percent tax increase.
The budget has approximately $1 million more in expenses than this year, coming in at $29.8 million for 2013-14. The revenues for the district are projected to be $28.7 million, compared to the $28 million in 2012-13.
There was a more than $1 million deficit in the budget that will mostly be covered by $1 million from the district's fund balance and the tax increase.
A 1.7-mill increase will bring the district's millage to 75.3 mills.
Board member Gregg Nogy was the only person to vote against the budget.
“I'm not opposed to the increase,” he said after the meeting. “You have to keep up with cost of living.”
But Nogy did not agree with some of the ways the district is spending money in the budget, such as full-day kindergarten, which was implemented last year. The change cost the district about $40,000.
“It cost the district a significant amount,” Nogy said. “And those same students in full-day kindergarten weren't doing better than students in half-day (kindergarten).”
The increases in the budget mainly came from retirement and health care benefits, said business manager Mike Wrobleski. Benefits increased about 3 percent and cost the district $4.1 million.
“A 3 percent increase is pretty substantial,” Wrobleski said.
The district has not had a tax increase since the 2009-10 school year and had a 2-mill tax decrease in 2011-12.
Next year's millage increase will bring in about $261,000 in revenue.
Kate Wilcox is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6155 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.