Share This Page

Police: Mt. Pleasant beating victim, son forged prescriptions

| Tuesday, June 18, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

A woman who was severely beaten in a Hempfield car dealership in 1996 and her son are accused of new counts of passing or attempting to pass bogus prescriptions.

Naomi Bailey, 51, and David Bailey, 34, both of East Main Street, Mt. Pleasant, were charged on Monday with forgery, acquisition by misrepresentation, attempted forgery, possession of a controlled substance, criminal use of a communications facility and manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance.

They will be arraigned at a later date in Greensburg District Judge James Albert's office. City police expect to withdraw charges they filed against the pair from a Feb. 14 incident in the Rite Aid pharmacy on East Pittsburgh Street.

The latest charges stem from incidents on Feb. 13 and Feb. 14.

On Feb. 13, police said, Naomi Bailey used a bogus prescription in the pharmacy to obtain Xanax, a drug used to treat anxiety and panic attacks.

She returned the next day with a bogus prescription for roxicodone, a pain medicine, police said. Pharmacy staff became suspicious, told her to return later that day for the medicine and called police, who encountered her in the store.

Bailey attempted to walk past them quickly, police said.

Authorities stopped and questioned her, and Bailey explained she was trying to fill a prescription for a friend, according to court papers.

At the station, police found a nonprescription bottle with a “large quantity of Xanax pills” in Bailey's purse, according to an affidavit.

They also found an oxycodone pill and five prescription forms “that appeared to match the consistency of the fraudulent one given to Rite Aid,” police said.

Authorities charged David Bailey with working with his mother to pass or attempt to pass the bogus prescriptions and obtain the drugs. Police believe the pair used cellphones to organize their effort to obtain the drugs.

Earlier, authorities seized at least $26,000 from Naomi Bailey's PNC Bank account, and they confiscated another $4,000 from the pair the night of Feb. 14, according to court papers.

Naomi Bailey suffered serious injuries when security guard Ronald E. Sager repeatedly struck her over the head with the butt end of a sawed-off shotgun on Jan. 16, 1996, at Star Chevrolet on Route 30, where she worked as a cleaning person.

Sager, who said he was under orders from aliens to attack Bailey, is serving a 10- to 24-year sentence in SCI Cresson.

Bailey received what her attorney described as a “substantial settlement” in 2001 in her suit against Sager, Ranger Investigations and Security — the company Sager worked for — and the dealership. The terms of the settlement weren't divulged because of a confidentiality clause.

Neither Star nor Ranger admitted liability.

Duke George, the Baileys' attorney, declined comment, saying he had not seen the latest complaints.

Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or bstiles@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.