Youngwood library plans advance
Youngwood council will vote next week on awarding contracts for the library construction project, which came in thousands of dollars under budget.
Bids were received for electric, HVAC and general construction at $72,000.
The low bids were: Marmat Construction of Hooversville for general construction for $33,000; MARC-Service of Windber for HVAC, $8,292; and A-1 Electric of Venetia, $30,000. A-1 is doing the electrical work for the new municipal building.
The project was originally estimated to cost $131,000, including $10,000 in architect fees. Council will vote during its Monday night meeting on the bids.
Because of a matching grant from Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund Library for $65,000, the library should only have to come up with about $40,000 for repairs, according to council Secretary-Treasurer Diane Derco.
Council members agreed to meet with the library board to discuss specifics of matching the grant and which organization was paying for the project.
“The agreement was that we were providing the building, and the library was coming up with the cost,” council president Lloyd Crago said.
Project manager Brian W. Hayes, of L.R. Kimball architecture firm, announced that the municipal building is coming in under budget so far, thanks to construction change orders in the negative.
“It's looking good,” Crago said of the building.
Council will vote on Monday on a new street clearing ordinance, requiring utility companies to repair any damage done to the roads by repairing to the center of the street. Formerly, companies were required by ordinance to repair only the immediate damage done.
Kate Wilcox is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.