Ex-Heritage Elementary PTO president makes plea deal in alleged theft
A plea agreement has been reached for the former president of the Heritage Elementary School Parent Teacher Organization accused of taking about $14,000 from two youth organizations.
Details of the agreement for Elizabeth Kindelberger will not be made public until Aug. 14 during a hearing before Westmoreland County Judge John E. Blahovec.
Kindelberger declined comment on Tuesday, when her right to a preliminary hearing was waived. Defense attorney Richard Galloway confirmed there is a plea deal.
“Everybody is in agreement that it's appropriate,” he said.
Stephanie Handerhan, the current president of the Heritage Elementary School PTO who came for the hearing, declined comment.
Kindelberger, 41, was charged with six counts of forgery, one count of theft, one count of theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received and one count of tampering with records.
She allegedly withdrew $9,997 from an account belonging to Heritage Elementary PTO, according to police. She allegedly took about $4,000 from Allegheny Force Football Club, a competitive soccer program, when she served as a team manager, according to a criminal complaint filed with Export District Judge Charles Conway.
The money was returned to the PTO account. The soccer club president told police he was unsure if that money had been returned.
Kindelberger recently resigned from her job as a library aide with Heritage Elementary. She had been employed with the district since November 2010, according to records.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6220 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.