Zoning board allows N. Huntingdon family to keep small farm animals
A North Huntingdon family will be allowed to keep small farm animals on a plot of land that's just shy of the required acreage typically required for barnyard animals.
The township zoning hearing board approved 3-0 the request from Art and Bonn McSorley Tuesday evening.
Art McSorley said he bought a 9.89-acre tract along Masters Lane hoping to improve the property with a small farm.
Under township zoning rules, a 10-acre lot is required to keep farm animals and livestock in the rural residential zoning district, zoning officer Tom McGuire said.
“A 10-acre lot would be approved without a variance,” McSorley said. “So we're just claiming that we're so close to 10 acres we should be allowed to have the farm animals.”
The zoning hearing board decided the difference in acreage was minimal enough to OK the plan.
“The amount of difference is so small,” Jacqueline Willis, board president said.
There's no additional property for the McSorleys to purchase to increase the lot, she said. Plus, she said, they do not plan to house large animals there.
McSorley said they will not raise full-size cows or horses. They may keep smaller animals, such as sheep, goats or miniature cows. A combination barn-garage would likely be built for the animals, he said.
The land could be used for an orchard and pasture, he said.
The property currently houses a three-bedroom house, a barn and a three-car garage.
Rossilynne Skena is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6646 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.