Unity's nonunion workers to get 3 percent raises
Unity supervisors approved a 3 percent wage increase for nonunion employees, a part of budgeted expenses.
Five township employees will receive increases that are annually reviewed, said Chairman Mike O'Barto.
He said supervisors overlooked giving the raises at the beginning of 2013.
“We got busy this winter, and we weren't able to actually vote on it,” O'Barto said.
The 3-percent increases were incorporated into the 2013 budget, he said.
Raises are retroactive to January, said supervisor Jake Blank. Full-time chief building inspector Merle Musick, building inspector Harry Hosack, zoning and ordinance officer Joann Dunn and building office secretary Sharon Sweeney each received raises.
Part-time zoning officer Chrystal Dunn also received a 3-percent raise.
“The nonunion employees that we have, especially our full-time people, do a magnificent job,” O'Barto said. “They keep their departments running, and the departments are quite healthy financially.”
Employee payroll accounts for a small percentage of the budget, which totaled $5.7 million in 2013, he said.
In other business, supervisors approved a conditional use and final site plan for a wholesale auto repair business.
The 1.5-acre property on Center Drive, zoned M-1 manufacturing, owned by Brian Grejtak is planned for repairs to cars that will be sold at an off-site auction or online.
Supervisors approved the plan provided no retail sales happen on the property and no cars remain stored outside for more than seven days in addition to complying with all other permits.
A final site plan for renovations of a building at Toyota of Greensburg was approved.
Three portions of the sales building will be renovated, and an in-house car wash will be added to the building owned.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.