Share This Page

N. Huntingdon to consider partnership to tackle flooding problems

| Thursday, July 18, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

North Huntingdon leaders will continue to meet with residents who are concerned about flooding on their properties, and they may consider a public-private partnership to fix the problem.

Three people spoke to commissioners at a meeting Wednesday about flooding woes, which have become more prevalent with recent heavy rainfall.

The problem area falls between Adams Drive and Roth Drive in the western portion of the township where a pipe channeling a creek runs beneath four properties, township manager John Shepherd said.

The township does not own the pipe, nor did they install it, Shepherd said.

“The pipe is collapsing and filling up with sediment,” he said.

Officials will meet with the affected citizens to see if there's interest in a partnership to fix the pipe, which could cost about $68,000, he said.

Another option, he said, is yanking out the pipe and allowing the stream, a tributary of Long Run, to run its course.

Township commissioner David Herold moved for the township to foot the entire bill to fix the pipe. The motion failed 3-3.

“I just don't think … people should have to live in fear every time it rains,” Herold said. “You get water in your house, that's a big thing — whether it's a little bit or a lot. I think we need to stand up. Let's do something so these people can have peace.”

Herold, Tony Martino and Donald Austin voted yes. Zachary Haigis, Brian West and Richard Gray voted no. Board president Lee Moffatt was absent.

“I'm not in favor of having the township completely doing the project,” Haigis said. “I'm not in favor of going on a private residence and fixing a private problem.”

Commissioner Richard Gray expressed concerns about what criteria the township would use to decide when to intervene in flooding issues.

“The private pipes are failing,” Gray said.

Officials laid out several options, one of which would include North Huntingdon paying for surveying and maintenance costs, Shepherd said.

The fix would be costly, considering it would divert a pipe around a driveway and necessitate a manhole, Michael Turley, assistant township manager, said.

“It's a costly and not a simple matter to fix,” Turley said.

The 24-inch pipe is in disrepair, township planning director Andrew Blenko said.

“It's in very poor condition. It's partially blocked,” Blenko said. “Why a 24-inch pipe was chosen is beyond me.”

Roth Drive resident Steve Reese told commissioners that water flows along Adams in between two homes and then onto his yard and driveway. He said water does not enter his home.

“Please help my family and the others involved,” Reese said. “We don't have this equity to do all of this ourselves.”

Township resident Michael Hornyak said he's not directly impacted by the issue, but he urged commissioners to take action. He called on commissioners to use township money to fix the problem citing an “obligation to manage that water” because it crosses a road.

“People should not live in fear every time it rains,” he said.

Resident Jonathan Murin, who lives in a different section of the township, also said his yard floods thanks to water that crosses beneath his driveway, even washing out the driveway.

Shepherd said officials will meet with Murin to learn more about the issue.

Rossilynne Skena is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6646 or rskena@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.