Blood drive planned for little girl with leukemia
Sisters Julie Ritenour and Jennifer Olack have recently worked to put together a replenishment blood drive for Sydney Hawk, the granddaughter of their friends Joe and Marty Hawk of Scottdale.
The drive will be held from 2 to 7 p.m. Monday in the Scottdale Fireman's Club, 405 Porter Ave.
Sydney Hawk, who turned 4 on May 22, was diagnosed with leukemia on March 5 after not responding to treatment for a sinus and ear infection. She then began chemotherapy treatments.
But after only two treatments, Sydney developed a severe infection on March 18, which caused her to spend 42 days in the Intensive Care Unit at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.
The Bridgeville girl's leukemia is in remission, but she will continue to undergo a 2½- to 3-year protocol of preventive chemotherapy treatment.
According to Marty Hawk's online journal updating her granddaughter's condition, in recent weeks, the chemotherapy treatments have continued to cause fevers and general discomfort for Sydney.
On July 13, Marty Hawk posted that Sydney woke up complaining of a slight headache, had increased heart rate and a slight fever. At first, doctors wanted to order a spinal tap, thinking that her headache was from increased intracranial pressure. Blood cultures were drawn at 4 a.m. The final consensus was that it was probably the chemotherapy delivered the day before that was the culprit of Sydney's symptoms.
Olack said they were really looking to do something for the family and thought that a blood drive would be much needed and appreciated.
Ritenour met with a representative from the Central Blood Bank, and the event was scheduled.
The sisters are hoping the community will come out to help Sydney and her family.
Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.