Penn Township foundry employee gets 23 months for brandishing rifle
A Greensburg man will serve up to 23 months in jail for storming into the foundry where he worked with a loaded assault rifle.
Matthew D. Smith, 28, pleaded guilty on Wednesday to charges of risking catastrophe, reckless endangerment, simple assault and disorderly conduct in the May 22 incident at Perma-Cast in Penn Township.
Smith had been suspended earlier that day for “violation of work performance,” according to police. Company officials told police that Smith was aggravated and left the building after he was notified of the three-day suspension.
A short time later, witnesses said, Smith returned to the plant in an industrial park near Route 22 and rushed through a loading dock door with an AK-47 rifle, along with a handgun in his pocket. He ordered workers to leave but made no verbal threats, police said.
Employees identified Smith, who left the building two minutes after he entered. After a 12-hour manhunt, Smith surrendered to authorities in Monroeville.
In court on Wednesday, Westmoreland County Judge Al Bell sentenced Smith to serve three to 23 months in the county jail and three additional years on probation. Although Smith is immediately eligible for parole, Bell ordered that he remain in jail until he undergoes a mental health evaluation.
Bell ordered that Smith may not own or possess any guns during his probation period.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.