Fire damages Scottdale home
Firefighters spray water on house fire Friday night at 816 Mulberry St., Scottdale. No injuries were reported and the cause of the fire is under investigation, Scottdale firefighters said.
No one was reported injured in a fire that damaged a Scottdale house Friday night, authorities said.
The fire at 816 Mulberry St. appeared to have started on the ground floor of the two-story house, Scottdale safety officer James Echard said. The cause of the fire remains under investigation, Echard said.
The fire was reported at 7:18 p.m. and the house sustained smoke and water damage, with several windows broken out.
The Westmoreland County Department of Public Safety said fire units still were at the scene at 9:50 p.m.
Scottdale fire Chief “Buzzy” Myers was not available for comment.
Hope L. and Scott Smith are listed as the owners of the property, according to documents in the Westmoreland County Recorder of Deeds office.
Tim Cunningham of Connellsville and Kevin Patik of Mt. Pleasant, who said they went to visit occupants of the house Friday night, said they saw smoke coming from the second story of the structure about 15 minutes after they had turned off an air-conditioner. The men said they had turned off the air-conditioner because of a strange odor.
Cunningham said they tried to douse the fire with cups of water, then called Westmoreland 911 to alert firefighters.
Scottdale were assisted by several neighboring units from Westmoreland and Fayette counties.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-836-5252.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.