Phony water crewmen rob Greensburg woman
Three men posing as water company workers robbed an elderly Greensburg woman of approximately $1,300, city police said.
Authorities are urging residents to use caution before admitting anyone claiming to be a utility worker into their homes.
About 1 p.m. Friday, the three men told the 84-year-old woman they wanted to test the water in her Highland Avenue home to solve a problem, police said.
They said they wanted to pay her $100 for using her water, but she needed to make them change first. They then directed her to another area of her home as part of a test and took the money from her purse, police said.
One of the suspects appears to be Hispanic and might have been involved in an incident earlier this month at a Moreland Avenue residence, police said.
In that incident, a Hispanic man and black woman rang a door bell twice, then tried to open the locked door when they didn't get an answer.
Two children, who heard the attempts to open the door, got their father from another room.
When the father inquired what the couple wanted, they asked whether anyone spoke Spanish, then left, police said.
Utility workers carry identification cards, and residents should ask to see that card before letting them inside their homes, police Capt. Chad Zucco said.
Residents can call whatever authority or company the workers say they work for to check on them, Zucco advised.
Typically, three utility workers are not going to come to a resident's door to inquire about doing work, he noted.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.