South Greensburg man charged with attempted homicide in machete attack
A South Greensburg man who was angry that his girlfriend telephoned an ex-boyfriend for a ride home on Friday allegedly attacked the man with a machete, Penn Township police said.
David R. Clara, 55, was charged by township police with attempted homicide, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, making terroristic threats and harassment in connection with the attack that allegedly occurred about 6:35 p.m. Friday on Bushy Run Road.
Clara's girlfriend wrecked on Route 30 near Westmoreland Mall, and she telephoned a former boyfriend who lives nearby for a ride, according to court documents.When the girlfriend and the former boyfriend arrived at her Forbes Road residence, “Clara was yelling ... visibly upset and angry,” township police Officer Joseph Lewis wrote in an affidavit of probable cause.
Police said Clara and the man exchanged words, then Clara walked to his vehicle and took out a 2 1⁄2-foot-long machete and began swinging it at the alleged victim.
Witnesses told Lewis that Clara was yelling “I'm going to kill you,” while repeatedly swinging the machete at the man's head. Clara missed the man's head on four swings, but struck his left hand, causing a deep gash, witnesses said.
Clara fled the scene but was apprehended in the parking lot of Primanti Brothers restaurant in Greensburg by state and city police.
Clara posted $10,000 bond set by District Judge Frank Pallone, pending a preliminary hearing on Aug. 6 before Kistler.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.