Fayette infant's mother ordered to stand trial in Greensburg
A Fayette County woman who allegedly left her infant alone in a hot car was ordered to stand trial following a preliminary hearing Thursday before Greensburg District Judge James Albert.
Alyssa C. Showman, 29, of Smock was charged by Greensburg police with endangering the welfare of a child after a woman reported seeing a 2-month-old child in a parked vehicle not far from the Medicine Shoppe on East Pittsburgh Street.
“I looked in the car beside me and saw the baby by itself, crying. I walked around the car a couple of times, hoping someone would see me and come out,” Stephanie Wright testified.
It was a hot day and the car's front windows were down, but the back windows were up, Wright said.
When no one came out to the car after a few minutes, Wright said she used her cellphone to take pictures of the baby and the car, then called 911.
Eventually, Showman appeared with a young girl, but then went into the Medicine Shoppe to purchase a beverage, leaving the girl and the baby in the car, Wright said.
Showman returned again, then drove away before police arrived, court records show.
Showman did not testify at the hearing, but her attorney, Lee Markovitz of Pittsburgh, said testimony did not show that the baby was in any danger.
“The baby was left in the car with an 11-year-old child. The front windows were rolled down. Where is the danger to the child? ... Anyone who leaves a child in an unlocked car even for a few minutes is guilty of a crime?” he said.
Assistant District Attorney Judi Petrush said state law mandates that children cannot be left unattended if they are out of their guardian's view.
“We don't know how long the baby was alone before (Wright) got there,” Petrush said.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.