Share This Page

WWII vet's medals a painful reminder

| Saturday, Aug. 17, 2013, 10:29 a.m.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Westmoreland Manor resident Andrew N. Iski, 91, speaks to Manor volunteer Gage Backus, 13, of Hempfield, about his experiences while serving in the European campaign of World War II following an awards ceremony near Greensburg on August 16, 2013. Iski received the Bronze Star among other medals and badges during the ceremony.

It's not that Andrew Iski doesn't appreciate the medals he's been waiting to receive for more than 65 years; the 91-year-old veteran of World War II just prefers that his family — daughters Andrea Diealt and Patty Phillips, son David and his six grandchildren and two great-grandchildren — have them.

“I don't want them,” he said Friday, after receiving the Bronze Star, a new Purple Heart and a half-dozen other medals. “I want no parts of anything military, no Purple Heart or nothing. I don't want no parts of it, just for the grandkids and everybody to know (about) grandpap.”

The medals would resonate as a source of pride for many, but for Iski they also bring up painful memories.

“Memories that never go out of you, that's the trouble,” he said. “They never go out of you; it stays in. My three soldiers I had killed in my squad, they'll never leave me.”

Diealt still has the original Purple Heart her father was awarded after taking a German machine gun bullet in the knee on March 25, 1945.

The other medals he earned during three European combat campaigns as a member of the 9th Armored Division — a Combat Infantry Badge, WWII Victory Medal, Good Conduct Medal, American Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal and rifle and submachine gun Army Marksmanship Qualification Badges — were finally awarded by U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, during Friday's ceremony in the chapel of Westmoreland Manor.

While Iski is confined to a wheelchair now, his memory of the war and his injury remain sharp.

“I was in the Battle of the Bulge. My oldest daughter, she was born Christmas Day (1944), and our fighting in that battle started December 22,” he recalled. “I was waiting to die, and she was being born.”

Three months later when he was injured, Iski didn't have his first-aid kit. He had used it to help another soldier even though doing so was against Army recommendations.

“I used it on another soldier, which you're not supposed to do,” he said “So another boy had to use his (on me). I begged him not to use his. He did it. He wouldn't listen to me. He went and patched me up.”

“I never thought I'd walk again at 23 years old,” he said. “But here I am today.”

He was able to walk again, eventually, but in the immediate aftermath he faced the harrowing prospect of escaping to relative safety in an active war zone without the use of his legs.

“Whenever I got shot, the bullet hit a nerve and I'm paralyzed. I can only crawl on my elbows,” he recalled. “One of our tanks coming up to help us was coming right directly at me... The driver only has a little wee hole to see, so I don't know if he sees me or not. I have to make a decision to either crawl left or crawl right. I crawl left and maybe 5 or 6 yards to me, he cut to my right.”

Recalling his war memories with 13-year-old Manor volunteer Gage Backus after the ceremony, Iski downplayed the importance of his service.

“We were at war with Japan and Germany at the same time. I was 20 years old, I figured I needed to be a soldier for my country, so I went and enlisted,” Iski told him. “... It's your duty. That's the way I looked at it.”

“It wasn't just your duty,” Backus reminded him. “You made a difference.”

Greg Reinbold is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-459-6100, ext. 2913, or greinbold@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.