Jeannette church vandalism suspect put in jail
As Sacred Heart Church in Jeannette struggles to find money in its budget for repairs to stained glass windows damaged by paintballs in June, one of the two alleged vandals was arraigned Tuesday for failing to appear at a hearing.
District Judge Joseph DeMarchis ordered Courtland Beach, 21, of White Township, Indiana County, held in the county prison when he failed to post $10,000 bond on charges of criminal mischief and institutional vandalism in connection with the June 17 paintball attack.
Beach was first cited by summons mailed to him, but he failed to appear at a scheduled hearing on Thursday before DeMarchis on charges that he damaged the 63-year-old stained glass windows in the church along Patton Avenue.
Both Beach and a teenage acquaintance he was visiting admitted to police that they fired paintballs at the church windows after Patrolman Justin Scalzo discovered two paintball guns and numerous capsules that contain water-soluble dye inside a gym bag on the porch of the juvenile's home.
The juvenile, who was not identified in court documents, is being adjudicated in county juvenile court, police Chief Brad Shepler said.
Police Cpl. Jeffrey Stahl said parish facilities manager Kathy Goodall received an initial estimate of at least $910 to repair the damaged windows.
“We haven't started the work yet. The paint pretty much washed off, but it put a small hole in the one window and cracked some of the surrounding panes,” Goodall said.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.