ShareThis Page

Hammer attack hospitalizes 1 with head injury

| Monday, Aug. 26, 2013, 11:22 p.m.
David L. Risher of Jeannette is accused of aggravated assault for allegedly striking a man in the head with a hammer.

A 48-year-old Jeannette man was arrested on Saturday on charges of striking an Irwin man on the head with a hammer during an argument.

David L. Risher was arrested by Jeannette police early Saturday after the argument with Edward J. Spolnick at Risher's apartment in the 100 block of McGee Avenue.

When police arrived at Risher's apartment at 12:12 a.m. Saturday, Spolnick was lying on the kitchen floor as he was being treated by a neighbor, who was trying to stop the bleeding, police Cpl. Richard J. O'Neal wrote in an affidavit of probable cause filed before District Judge Joseph DeMarchis.

“Risher stated that he did hit Spolnick with a hammer that was sitting on top of a cabinet because he wanted him to leave his house and Spolnick refused,” O'Neil said.

Before paramedics took Spolnick, 50, to an ambulance to transport him to a medical helicopter for a flight to UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh, they told police that Spolnick “had a visible injury to his head that resembled the claw end of the hammer,” O'Neil wrote.

Police indicated Risher and Spolnick had been drinking before the assault.

Spolnick's condition was not released by the hospital.

Risher was jailed in the county prison when he failed to post $25,000 bond. He is charged with aggravated assault.

Risher's preliminary hearing is scheduled for Thursday before DeMarchis.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.