Fayette, Westmoreland bridges get new/lower weight restrictions
PennDOT has announced new or lower weight restrictions on bridges in Fayette and Westmoreland counties, but these may not affect traffic in most locations.
Joseph Szczur, district executive for PennDOT in the region, said the restrictions have been announced because PennDOT does not have a funding stream to do work on the structures and the restrictions are being put in place to prevent further deterioration and to make sure the structures are safe.
He added that the problems have been made worse because of California emissions standards and a push for better mileage by the federal government.
“The problem is that people are driving the same number of miles or more miles, but are getting more miles per gallon,” Szczur said. “It is the perfect storm (that detracts from funding for) the transportation system at a time when we need more revenue.”
He said the Corbett administration has tried to create an annual, sustained funding stream. The Legislature has failed to enact a tax that was to be placed on wholesale gasoline distributors. Over the years, other sources of funding have been made available. The Rendell administration had instituted a $375 million appropriation that corrected problems on a few thousand bridges. Four years ago, Pennsylvania got $1 billion in federal funds, which took care of 29 roadway and bridge projects.
Those were one-time infusions of funding, however, and many bridges have reached or exceeded their normal life spans of 50 years.
“(You) can't manage transportation needs like that,” he said. “We have shown that annually, that $1.5 billion to $2 billion is necessary to maintain the system, as is.”
According to Valerie Petersen, District 12 spokesperson in Uniontown, restrictions have been placed on the following bridges in Fayette County:
• Route 1050 (Englishman Hill Road), south of Route 982, over Mountz Creek in Bullskin Township — 33 tons, except combinations of 40 tons. The former weight limit was 34 tons, except combinations of 40 tons.
• Route 1001 (Kooser Road), north of Fairmont, over Mill Run, in Springfield Township — 24 tons, except combinations of 32 tons. The former weight limit was 25 tons, except combinations of 35 tons.
• Route 1043 (Bitner Road), east of Route 51, over Redstone Creek, in North Union and Franklin townships — 34 tons, except combinations of 40 tons. There was no previous weight restriction.
• Route 1055 (Dunbar Ohiopyle Road), near Betty Knox Road, over Tucker Run, in Dunbar Township — 32 tons, except combinations of 38 tons. The former weight limit was 36 tons, except combinations of 40 tons.
• Route 1058 (County Line Road), over Indian Creek, near Fayette and Westmoreland County line, in Saltlick Township — 35 tons, except combinations of 40 tons. There was no previous weight restriction.
Scott Keefer, a Bullskin Township supervisor, said Englishman Hill Road is used by empty trucks going to a stone quarry. However, he said those trucks use a different route, Swink Hill, upon leaving the quarry.
Ross Miner, a Springfield Township supervisor, said there is no major truck traffic on Route 1001 over Mill Run.
“The only thing that goes over that bridge is school buses, and there is another way around,” Miner said.
There is one local bridge in Westmoreland County:
— Route 2021 (Norvelt Road), northwest of Route 981 over Sewickley Creek in Mt. Pleasant Township — 35 tons except combinations of 40 tons. There was no previous weight restriction.
Mt. Pleasant Township Supervisor Frank Puskar said most heavy truck traffic that does go over the bridge would find the restrictions a problem, but he did not know if there were any.
Several officials said the restrictions on the bridges are no problem for school buses because they do not come up to the restricted weights.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-626-3538.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Franklin Regional security guard fighting to get job back
- Restitution closes chapter for New Stanton mother
- Slickville murderer’s appeal tossed
- Jeannette traffic stop leads to drug charges
- Pitt presents Web resource to combat OD deaths
- New Stanton rejects road work bids
- Golf outing a fitting tribute
- Psychologist to evaluate Greensburg woman involved in Daugherty killing
- Trio holds up Penn couple at gunpoint in home
- Videotaping suspect from Greensburg doesn’t show at hearing
- Reputed leader of motorcycle gang returned to Pa. to face charges