Yough votes to send old textbooks abroad
Yough School Board will send its old social studies and science textbooks to underprivileged students across the globe.
The board voted on Wednesday night to partner with a company that will take the used books for no cost and distribute them to countries in need. The profit from any books that the company can sell will be split 50/50 with the district.
Superintendent Janet Sardon said she does not anticipate much revenue from the venture.
“Otherwise, we were just going to dispose of the books,” she said. “Some of them are quite old.”
The board also approved an agreement with Ion/McDonald Land Services to do seismic 3D geophysical testing at the high school, H.W. Good, Mendon and West Newton elementary schools. The company constructs 3D underground maps and sells them to drilling companies. The district will receive about $500 from the agreement. The district has a lease agreement with Chevron.
The board approved a $1,900 study of the heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system in the H.W. Good library. Conditions in the library are very humid, Sardon said.
“It's not good for a library situation,” she said.
Sardon said she expects the results of the study within the next month.
Kate Wilcox is a reporter for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.