Ex-Derry Area boosters chief given probation for theft
The former head of the booster club for the Derry Area High School football team will serve two years on probation for stealing more than $27,000 from the organization.
Lori Nicely, 49, was in court on Tuesday and formally agreed to participate in a prison diversion program in lieu of entering a guilty plea to criminal theft charges.
Nicely entered the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program for first-time, nonviolent offenders in which she can have her arrest record expunged upon successful completion of the probation period.
Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway said Nicely's probation could be terminated after one year.
Investigators said Nicely, while she served as president of the Derry Area Football Boosters Association from 2009 to 2011, stole $27,711 from the organization. Police said Nicely pocketed revenue generated from ticket sales and fundraisers.
According to court records, Nicely repaid the boosters $8,200 in February after she was confronted with the theft allegations.
On Monday, Nicely paid $8,000 more in restitution. Assistant District Attorney Greg DeFloria said the ARD was contingent on Nicely paying that restitution. She won't have to pay any additional money to the boosters, he said.
Jodie Edmiston, the new boosters president, said the theft had a lingering financial impact on the organization.
“It affects the kids,” Edmiston said. “We had to have the students pay for most of their (summer football) camp this year because we didn't have the money.”
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.