Mt. Pleasant authority's claims list decreasing
Vice Chairman Charles Naggy announced at the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Authority Board meeting this week that the list of claims resulting from the 3-year-old sewage project has dramatically decreased.
“We have approximately 19 claims on our list, and about 10 of them are ready to be processed,” Naggy said.
During the May board meeting, Chairman Jerome Yasher said the All Complaint Status Report contained 319 filed complaints.
Naggy said all but the 19 have been addressed. The board voted to have solicitor Les Mlakar send letters to claimants regarding signing off on approved claims for 10 of the 19 complaints.
“We still have about nine people we need more information on, then that will complete the entire complaint list,” Naggy said.
Resident Joe Tandarich of Windy Hill Drive spoke to the board about a landscaping and drainage issue at his home as a result of the sewage project.
“When it rains, it's just like opening a fire hydrant when it comes out of the pipe,” Tandarich said.
Naggy told Tandarich that he spoke with Mlakar, who was not in attendance at Tuesday's meeting, regarding the matter and that a work crew is scheduled to be there this week. He said the crew would regrade the property with a swell and place stone.
“Thanks for your patience. We're finally getting there,” Naggy said.
In other business, the authority received a letter from the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County alerting them to unusually high water usage at the treatment plant. Naggy said the letter indicated there could be an internal leak or even a stuck toilet valve. He said the issue will be addressed.
The next board meeting will be held Oct. 22.
Linda Harkcom is a contributing writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.