Latrobe school art display proposal gets $1 million grant from Richard King Mellon Foundation
Architectural rendering of the Greater Latrobe Junior High School improvements made possible in part by a grant from the Richard King Mellon Foundation.
A plan to establish a display area for museum-quality art at Greater Latrobe Junior High School is moving forward, thanks to a $1 million grant, school officials said Wednesday.
The Richard King Mellon Foundation's gift also will improve technology in district classrooms, officials said.
“We're just absolutely thrilled about it,” said Maryann White, president of Greater Latrobe Partners in Education Foundation.
“Right now (the involved area for the art collection) is very dull, very dreary. We're bringing in new life,” she said.
Most of the grant will go to renovating the display area for the junior high art collection. This collection will be based on the one that has adorned the senior high school for the last 75 years, White said.
The intent of the art collection is to foster student success, Superintendent Judith Swigart said.
“Obviously, it is a total transformation for the school district,” she said. “We're extremely excited to have the opportunity to expand the special art collection.”
Plans are to put the project out for bid early next year and do construction in the summer, White said.
“White boards” and other state-of-the-art technology tools will be added to kindergarten through grade 12 classrooms with a portion of the money, officials said.
“Our board members are deeply honored to have the trust and confidence of such a highly regarded and respected foundation,” White said.
“Their leadership role in creating a world-class learning environment for the Greater Latrobe community's students through private philanthropy is truly affirming,” she added.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.