Shooting in drug deal gone wrong earns Mt. Pleasant teen prison term
A Mt. Pleasant teen will serve as many as 10 years in prison for using a gun during a drug transaction last year.
Keenan D. Frye, 19, was convicted by a Westmoreland County jury in July of drug and gun offenses in connection with a shooting incident on South Silver Street in Mt. Pleasant.
Frye was acquitted of the most serious charges, including attempted murder and aggravated assault.
Police said Frye shot Josh Grimm, 28, of Everson four times during a drug deal on Oct. 17. Frye maintained at trial he acted in self-defense.
Witnesses testified that Grimm used text messages to set up a late-evening meeting with Frye to purchase marijuana.
Witnesses said Grimm attacked Frye, knocked him to the ground and sprayed him with Mace as Grimm allegedly attempted to steal marijuana and money from Frye.
The prosecution contended Frye pulled a handgun out of a bookbag he carried and fired four shots, striking Grimm's shoulder and left side.
In court on Thursday, Judge Rita Hathaway imposed a mandatory sentence of five years to 10 years in prison against Frye.
Defense attorney Emily Smarto said she opposed the mandatory sentence.
“He is a young individual, and the circumstances do not warrant a five- to 10-year sentence,” Smarto said.
Hathaway said she was bound to sentence Frye as the law dictated.
“I also am not a fan of mandatory sentencing because it takes discretion away from the court. But five years might be appropriate in this case,” Hathaway said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.