Council considers $21.5M project at Seton Hill
Greensburg City Council will vote next week on plans for Seton Hill University's proposed health sciences building.
Council is scheduled to consider both the site and land development plans when it meets on Monday.
Council's approval will be the final step before work can begin, city planner Barb Ciampini said.
Council reviewed building plans during a meeting Tuesday.
The Health Sciences Center is part of the university's long-term expansion plans and will add 60,000 square feet of learning space. The center is proposed to connect with an existing science building in Lynch Hall on the main campus.
Costs are estimated at $21.5 million for the center and renovations to Lynch Hall. Donations and grants have helped the project to get off the ground.
The four-story center will link to Lynch Hall on two levels. The building's appearance will match the existing science hall and feature a cylindrical glass atrium.
Inside the building will be examination rooms, classrooms, laboratories and office space for students in a variety of majors, including the physician assistant program and pre-medicine students who earn degrees from the university and Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine.
Nearly one-third of freshmen are enrolled in health science programs, university officials said.
The project was kick-started by a $7 million grant from the Richard King Mellon Foundation, the largest gift in the school's history.
The Katherine Mabis McKenna Foundation has pledged $1.5 million, and an anonymous donor has earmarked $750,000, according to the university's website.
The work is expected to be completed in late 2015.
Greensburg's planning commission recommended council approve the plans.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.