County joins block grant pilot program
Westmoreland County was one of 10 counties added on Thursday by Gov. Tom Corbett to a pilot program that awards human services funding through block grants.
The county will receive $15.7 million in discretionary funding to pay for community-based mental health services, programs for behavioral health and intellectual disability clients, child welfare, drug and alcohol treatment, homeless assistance and human service development projects.
Those programs in the past were given specific funding amounts by the state.
“We'll go into it slowly and thoughtfully, and hopefully we can save money on administrative costs. The whole idea is to get the money to people who need it and not eat it up with administrative costs,” Commissioner Charles Anderson said.
Westmoreland County was rejected for the block grant program last year. As a result, the county hired Dirk Matson to head a newly unified Human Services Department that consolidated nine social service programs under one umbrella.
Matson was hired with the directive to secure the block-grant funding for the county.
He said on Thursday the county has budgeted block-grant money to mirror last year's allocations.
“We decided not to make changes in how the money is allocated this year. Next year, we might see more discretionary use,” Matson said.
Allegheny, Beaver, Butler and Greene counties were awarded block-grant funding last year as part of the initial pilot project. Westmoreland and Washington counties were added this year as the Corbett administration expanded the program to include 30 counties.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.