Ligonier YMCA requests to get 2nd look
Ligonier Borough Council will hold a special meeting on Oct 29 in Town Hall regarding the Ligonier Valley YMCA's zoning requests to expand its facility along West Church Street.
“We're meeting to reconsider the two ordinances and see what the legal ramifications are regarding having rejected these two ordinances,” council President Robert Helterbran said on Wednesday.
On Oct. 7, council voted 4-3 to deny the requests, which proposed changing the zoning on two properties — from R-2, two-family residential, to C-2, general commercial — and to amend the zoning ordinance to allow surface parking lots as a conditional use.
Helterbran said the legal ramifications will be discussed in an executive session, and “if a re-vote needs or wants to be taken” concerning the two ordinances, council may do so since that portion of the meeting will be open to the public.
According to a public notice posted on the borough's website, anyone interested in speaking about the ordinances is invited to attend the meeting.
YMCA Chief Executive Officer Ben Wright said the YMCA has notified borough officials that it plans to appeal the rejection of the ordinances to Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court.
Wright said he is pleased that council is going to reconsider the two ordinances.
“We don't believe they took into consideration all of the information they had,” Wright said.
For more information, visit www.ligonierboro.com.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.