Greensburg Salem school directors to vote on limiting amount of tax increase
Greensburg Salem school directors will vote next week on limiting the amount of a tax increase with the next budget.
Directors will vote Wednesday to impose a real estate tax increase no greater than 2.2 mills for the 2014-15 budget.
During a meeting Wednesday, directors briefly discussed an involved resolution stemming from Act 1 of 2006.
Under the law, school districts either must limit the amount of a tax increase to a set percentage, or index, or file papers with the state to seek exceptions and exceed the limit.
Greensburg Salem's index is 2.7 percent, or the equivalent of 2.2 mills.
Business Manager James Meyer said 2.2 mills would generate about $475,000 in additional tax revenue.
The tax increase could be less.
In another matter, Jennifer King expressed concerns about voting at James H. Metzgar Elementary School while students are in class, such as on Tuesday.
A gate restricts voters to the voting area, but that gate is not locked, she explained. As a result, voters can roam within the school if they wish, she said.
“We don't feel it's safe for our children to be in school (while voters) virtually can go anywhere,” King said.
There were no problems on Tuesday because numerous parents were at the school that day for a bake sale. But that isn't always the case, she said.
“We would really like to see the elections held when the kids aren't in school,” King said.
Having an in-service day on election day might be a good idea, she suggested.
On an in-service day, teachers attend school but students don't.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.