Southmoreland schools to get $100K grant
The Southmoreland School District will receive a $100,000 donation from the Scottdale Bank & Trust Company through the Educational Improvement Tax Credit Program.
“This organization has donated thousands upon thousands upon thousands of dollars through the EITC program over the years,” Superintendent John Molnar told the school board on Thursday. “We purchase things for our programs that we would not be able to do with our regular budget.”
Molnar read a letter from Linda Croushore, executive director of the Consortium for Public Education, explaining the donation.
“The Consortium is approved to accept funds that enhance student leadership, career exploration and literacy development, so we ask you to use these dollars accordingly,” Crushore's letter stated.
Molnar said the funds have previously been used for a mini-music lab, environmental field trips and hardware and software for the accelerated reader program.
“I'm anxious to meet with my team to determine how we're going to use this money,” Molnar said after the meeting.
Thursday's meeting also marked the end of the tenure of school directors Josie Kauffman and Catherine Fike.
Molnar presented Kauffman with a plaque recognizing her service as a board member. Fike was not in attendance.
“Being a member of a school board is often a thankless job,” Molnar said. “It requires a great deal of your time and a great deal of your efforts.”
School Director Ken Alt, Fike's main ally on the board, praised his colleague.
“The definition of a school director is Dr. Fike,” Alt said. “Someone that puts the time and the research in, wasn't afraid to bring it in. I will miss her at my side here.”
Paul Paterra is a staff editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-887-6101 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.