Share This Page

Families thankful for addition via adoption

| Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Mary and Roger Piper celebrate with their two children Alyssa, 5, and Cody after formal adoption proceedings in the courtroom of Judge Chris Scherer on November 21, 2013.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Josie Bortz of New Alexandria holds Lily, 2, her newly adopted daughter at their home on Thursday, November 21, 2013.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Josie Bortz of New Alexandria holds Lily, 2, her newly adopted daughter at their home on Thursday, November 21, 2013.

Two Westmoreland County families need look no farther than the faces of their adopted children to find the true meaning of being thankful.

The parents, who have all finalized adoptions within the past five weeks, traveled different paths, but ended their journeys in the same place — standing before a judge to explain why they should raise the children who had been placed under the supervision of the Westmoreland County Children's Bureau for various reasons.

When Mary Piper stepped before that judge, the Derry Township woman was already emotional about the prospect of adopting her grandchildren, Alyssa, 5, and Cody, 3.

“Can you tell the court why you want to adopt?” asked Children's Bureau Solicitor Chuck Wade.

“Because I love them,” Piper said through tears.

While awaiting the judge's decision, Cody, dressed in a white turtleneck and a sweater vest emblazoned with a fire truck, sat on his grandfather's lap and Alyssa sat next to her adoptive mother-to-be wearing a polka dot sweater dress and pink leggings, her blonde hair in a ponytail.

“I love these kids, I'm very lucky to have them both,” Roger Piper said.

And then came word from the judge.

“It is in their best interests, I approve their adoption,” ruled Judge Chris Scherer. “Enjoy it as much as you can today.”

Thus far in 2013, 42 children have been adopted through the Children's Bureau, according to county records.

The ultimate goal for these children is reunification with their biological parents, said casework supervisor Molly Ridilla.

But sometimes that isn't in the child's best interest and caseworkers try to identify someone within the family to act as a foster parent until the parents' rights to the child can be terminated, either voluntarily or by a judge, Ridilla said.

A foster family outside of the family is a last resort, she said.

Fostering can eventually lead to adoption, a process that takes about two years, Ridilla said.

Judge Christopher Feliciani, who has presided over numerous adoptions in his 10 years on the bench, said the adoption ceremonies signal a start to lives of security and stability for the children.

“The reason adoptions are so meaningful is because it brings finality to what, often times, are years of broken memories, changes in placements and turmoil these children endure,” Feliciani said.

For Josie Bortz of Salem, the decision to adopt her 2-year-old niece was simple.

When she began caring for Lily in June 2011, when the baby was 3 months old, Bortz learned by trial-and-error about how to care for the infant with the help of family and friends.

“I have never even got to be her aunt, I've always been her mom,” Bortz said about the energetic little blonde girl whose favorite stuffed animal is a dog named “Woof Woof.”

Bortz and her financé, Cory Morgan, have a son, 2-year-old Dean. Lily was officially adopted on Oct. 30.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or rsignorini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.