Horse taken in by Derry Township rescue succumbs to starvation
Despite being rescued and receiving care, an emaciated horse found last week along a Derry Township road died on Sunday morning.
The horse, renamed Rosie by the Second Chance Equine Association, a Norvelt-based rescue and rehabilitation organization, was so thin that many of her bones jutted out. She was found along Atlantic Road by a passerby, said Jan Dillon of the Humane Society of Westmoreland County.
“Sometimes when they come to us there's not enough there for us to save,” said Bryce LeJeune, president of Second Chance.
Rosie was taken to Second Chance's quarantine barn and examined by a veterinarian when she was found.
Dillon said the doctor pulled 41 ticks off the “very skinny,” reddish-brown quarter horse, estimated to be about 20 years old.
The horse spent much of Tuesday lying under donated blankets to raise her body temperature and consuming electrolytes, hay and warm water.
Friday, she was able to stand and eat grass on her own. Volunteers were working to get the horse's weight up so medical care could proceed. But by Sunday, Rosie didn't have any strength left.
LeJeune said the starvation that Rosie endured before making it to the rescue was a major factor in her death.
“We gave her a few days of food and she was warm,” he said. “We did everything we could possibly do.”
LeJeune said the horse's owner has been identified but it is up to the Humane Society to decide what to do next.
Kate Wilcox is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6155 or email@example.com. Reporter Renatta Signorini contributed to this article.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.