Derry Borough eyes 2.25-mill tax hike
Derry Borough property owners could face a 2.25-mill tax hike under a tentative 2014 spending plan council agreed to advertise for final action in December.
The increase would take the levy on real estate to 30 mills, the maximum rate permitted by law.
The higher tax would help support a proposed budget totaling $874,767, which represents an increase of about $18,000 compared to the 2013 budget.
Council members indicated the millage hike is necessary to maintain borough operations. Councilman Allen Skopp noted it should enable the borough to avoid laying off any of its employees.
“We have cut everything we can cut,” said budget committee member Nelie Smith.
The fiscal plan calls for trimming overall police spending from the current year's total of $191,369 to $182,819.
The lower amount is about the same that was available to cover police expenditures in 2012, a fact that caused some concern for Mayor David Bolen.
“It's going to be tight,” he said of the reduced budget for 2014, which accounts for pay increases for officers.
He said he would “do the best I can” to work within the budgeted spending limit, but added, “Public safety comes first.”
Council members noted they're doing their part to hold down expenditures.
They voted beginning next year to cut in half pay the members receive for attending meetings. Those newly elected will each receive $25 per meeting for up to two meetings per month.
The mayor's annual salary will be cut from $1,800 to $1,200.
Council members agreed to delay advertising the budget for about a week to allow time for tweaking some line items.
Jeff Himler is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-459-6100, ext. 2910 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.