1 vote elects Export mayor
By one vote, Export Mayor Michael Calder appears to have won a second term in office.
The Westmoreland County Board of Elections on Thursday approved Calder's write-in vote total that included various versions of his name.
Calder, who was defeated in the spring Democratic primary by former Mayor Robert Campagna, was given credit for 91 write-in votes.
Campagna, whose name appeared on the Nov. 5 ballot, received 90 votes.
Calder could not be reached for comment on Thursday.
Campagna said he may appeal the board's decision.
“I haven't decided yet,” Campagna said as he left the courthouse.
The election board's decision came down to accepting variations of spellings of Calder's name, including votes for “Mike Climar,” “Mike Calden” and “Mike Coldred.”
County Commissioners Charles Anderson, Tyler Courtney and Ted Kopas serve as members of the board of elections. They unanimously agreed that the variations of Calder's name were close enough to give him credit for the votes.
The county's election bureau initially did not count one write-in vote cast for “Mike Climar” as part of the mayor's vote total.
“We try to measure intent, which is a very difficult test. It's a very inexact science,” said Election Bureau Director Jim Montini.
Commissioners said it appeared all 91 voters intended to vote for Calder.
If just one of the write-in votes was not counted, Calder and Campagna would have finished in a tie that would have been broken by a casting of lots.
Montini said that unless a challenge of the results is filed in Common Pleas Court, the election will be official in five days.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.