Lawsuit linked to stabbing at Hempfield lounge
A Herminie man injured in a bar stabbing two years ago has sued the Hempfield restaurant where the attack occurred, alleging that the business did a poor job of protecting its customers.
Chaz Bazzo, 26, filed a three-count lawsuit in Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court last week against Rodney's Lounge and a Pittsburgh man convicted of stabbing him on Nov. 26, 2011.
Davon Darnell Evans, 23, of the Hill District was sentenced by Judge Debra Pezze to a prison term of 6 to 20 years.
Evans pleaded guilty in August 2012 to charges of aggravated assault and other offenses for stabbing John Daniel Walsh at Hi-Way Playground on July 23, 2011, and Corey Frohnhoffer and Bazzo at Rodney's on Nov. 26, 2011.
In the lawsuit, Bazzo contends that Rodney's employees knew that Evans was intoxicated and they should not have continued to serve him alcohol.
Bazzo claims that Rodney's workers were incapable of providing proper security and that the restaurant was negligent because it allowed violent people on its premises.
The restaurant failed to properly staff its business with a sufficient number of bouncers and did not take preventative measures such as installing metal detectors, according to the lawsuit.
A manager at Rodney's, who declined to be identified, said on Tuesday that he could not comment on the allegations.
According to police, Evans touched the buttocks of a female patron, causing Bazzo and Frohnhoffer, 24, to intervene.
Frohnhoffer, of Pittsburgh, was cut in the face, and Bazzo was stabbed in the head and abdomen, according to police.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer forTrib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.