High-grade marijuana lands man in trouble
A June traffic stop in Hempfield netted about 230 grams of hydroponic marijuana and an arrest warrant for a Hempfield man.
Micah Thor Metz, 21, of Greensburg will have a preliminary hearing on drug-related charges filed on Wednesday in connection with about $3,500 worth of marijuana seized from his car and residence.
State Police Trooper John Isoldi Jr. said he pulled over a blue Toyota sedan that Metz was driving for a speeding violation along Carbon Road near Greensburg on June 5.
Isoldi said he noticed an “odor of raw marijuana” emanating from the vehicle. Through a search warrant, investigators seized about 85 grams of hydroponic marijuana in a sealed package from the car, he said.
Hydroponic marijuana is “homegrown” rather than planted in soil outdoors and investigators believe the package may have been shipped to Metz from out of state, Isoldi said.
Hydroponic marijuana — which is more potent — seems to be gaining popularity “just for the quality,” he said.
“It's very expensive,” Isoldi said.
Police said another 153 grams of hydroponic marijuana seized from Metz's home was packaged similarly to what investigators confiscated from the car, Isoldi said.
An assault rifle also was taken from the residence.
Metz faces charges of conspiracy, possession with intent to deliver, drug possession and possession of a small amount of marijuana for personal use.
A preliminary hearing will be scheduled before District Judge James Albert.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.